Wednesday, August 31, 2022

Duality Sept. 4, 2012

   

I remain conflicted as to how much she says or does is conscious.

 Sometimes, she seems to have a dual personality, sometimes kind, sometimes ruthless, as evident in the poem in which she spoke about clawing and the poem she took down about trickling up, a confession of sort in which she blamed society trickling down turned her into something she never dreamed she would be, and her response to it is to use whatever means necessary to claw her way to get what she needs, “frank” and (as she put it it) “un-adult-erated.”

Yet for all that, for all her street smarts, she remains vulnerable, seeing herself as a Cinderella waiting for her prince charming to arrive with the glass slipper she left behind at the ball, because as she put it: “When it works it’s fucking spectacular.”

But as the last few months have shown, she does not know who she can trust – least of all me, and there is a kind of panic in that, as she needs allies, and yet as another poem put it, she’s been betrayed before and should have learned to expect it.

Oh, what a lonely life she leads, trusting too much in the wrong people, then trusting nobody when she is ultimately betrayed.

I am confused too by her sudden animosity towards me as expressed in her last poem when I clearly did nothing to deserve it (or at least not recently), leading me to question whether there was any softening in the hostilities I thought I saw over the last month. Is it all duality, she flickering between two or three personalities, angry then not, then angry again?

Or were those moments when she seemed kind, when her poems offered some measure of compassion simply traps to lure me into presuming something that does not exist, her rage so intense that she would feign some level of empathy when in fact she waits behind the mask with sharpened claws?

It is clearly best to retain distance and hope that rage might turn on somebody else.

 

  2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Tuesday, August 30, 2022

A no win situation Sept. 2, 2012

  

My poet friend, Mary Ann, sent me a screen shot of the webpage.

It had a photograph of the stair leading up to the apartment and an invitation for a male friend to come visit.

Her (my co-worker’s) site had been closed to me for months. So, I stopped bothering to check the site sometime in mid-June.

Mary Ann thought I should see the post, perhaps to convince me of how she has moved on, and not everything she posts is not about me.

I don’t know why I felt jealous, but I did.

When I went to the site, I found it open again, although scrubbed clean of all those intimate messages she had with family members and friends. Except for that Mae West posting to some male friend that sounded a lot like, “Why don’t you come up and see my sometime.”

She had also posted a picture of herself at the beach, taken by her brother during the same week I was on vacation.

I had assumed she would have gone to the beach with her new boyfriend, not her brother. But she’ always surprising me like that.

Why did she unblock me on Facebook after two months of being blocked?

Was this some attempt to ensnare me, to make me think things have thawed with the hope I’d try to contact her again. I still suspect some other signs of thawing that may have had a similar intent, trying to get more evidence to use against me.

She obviously is still concerned about me, looking over her shoulder (as one poem put it) to see that I’m still there.

Maybe she’s right about me in her last poem, about my being elusive, I mean.

I’ve been very careful not to do or say anything that would feed her paranoid illusion about me being a stalker.

I am fascinated by how she goes about getting what she wants.

But the poor guy from Brooklyn, I think, really loves her – or at least is obsessed with her, and from what I recall from the texts she showed me, she seems to have prodded him into responding when he would have been wises not to.

I can’t help thinking that some of the thawing I though occurred over the last month was more of the same with me, expecting me to over react the way the poor guy from Brooklyn did.

So, when I don’t respond, I get labeled “a schizophrenic jerk, an ephemeral vagrant with borderline personality, a nagging bother with a clever, ill-timed (snicker) elusiveness.”

It’s a no-win situation, I’m damned if I do, and damned if I don’t, but I’m better off damned for not reacting.

    2012 menu



email to Al Sullivan

Monday, August 29, 2022

Competition, really? Sept. 1, 2012

  I only panicked slightly yesterday when I got tin the auxiliary office and found a message that I should call the owner.

What on earth could it be about? Could she have complained to him?

Oddly enough, there has been a strange remote competition between me and her as some of my stories pushed hers off the top hit list on our website.

She seemed a little smug when her stories got the most hits, and perhaps got annoyed when mine replace hers. Is this what she meant in that poem about someone taking what she clawed to get?

This isn’t the only competition either. She posts an outstanding photo with one of her stories, and I post one that is just as good, sometimes better.

None of this is intentional on my part (although I get off on it when it happens), but it must seem that way to her.

Does she complain about it to the owner?

Her writing is brilliant, which makes it difficult for me to compete, which half explains our former temporary boss’ fascination with her. He seems determined to help her cultivate her craft, while I’m for the most part on my own, struggling to keep up.

The owner scares me. He’s been on edge ever since he got back from his extended vacation in the Midwest last month.

I called him anticipating the worst, only to have him ask me if city hall is upset with us.

“Why would you think that?” I asked.

“Because they’re not returning any of our phone calls,” he said.

“Do you want me to call them and ask?”

“No, no,” he said. “I’m asking them for a favor.”

I’d never heard him sound so insecure. But then, he rarely read the political tea leaves right, always backing the wrong people, people with money but without ethics and most often snake oil schemes that generally failed.

I hung up relieved, though not without apprehension.

The owner talks to her frequently at the office, and I haven’t a clue as to what is said if anything about me.

After more than four weeks of non-interaction with me, she still harbors ill feelings as evident in her last poem, making me wonder if her New York stalker has finally given up on her, and she misses the interaction.

Does he miss her, too? Does he read her poetry and try to put the pieces together? Does he think the last poem was about him?  Does he listen to her music the way I sometimes still do, taking comfort in hearing her voice when he knows he can never see her again, knowing she has moved out without him?

 

    2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Sunday, August 28, 2022

Letting it all fade away. Aug. 31, 2012

   

He called me up to ask me how my vacation went.

He always pretends like he’s my friend but always comes across as if he’s being sly, trying to be clever, trying to get me to do or say something that might reveal something about myself that fits in his narrative – or hers.

I always feel like I’m walking through a mine field when I talk to him, one wrong step and I set off a chain reaction – like a did last month for her birthday.

That said, I truly believe he is my friend, someone I betrayed badly, when I should not have. He feels deeply, and I get the sense he really wants to protect her – and is trying to balance this as well as maintain our friendship.

I can not longer talk to him about her, partly because I sound like a fool when I do, and partly because I’m afraid what I said might later be used against me, even when I believe I am innocent.

I do not want to force him to choose between the two of us, and so keep quiet when it comes to her.

I mistakenly believed that the last four weeks had seen an easing of tension when perhaps this was a deception as well, a few innocent poems then another shot between the eyes with her time piece.

Perhaps the poem came as a result of my foolish attempt to speak with her at the office on Tuesday, or perhaps she managed for hide her rage for the last four weeks only to have it bubble up again when she could not pin me down as a possible stalker, when I clearly am not. I mistook a lull for her moving on when it appears she still sees me as a potential threat.

 

In the poem (if actually directed at me) called me “clever” and “elusive” as well a crazy and masked the insult in her usual passive/aggressive way as to be able to deny the insult later if I was foolish enough to tell anybody about it.

She is not really good at confrontation, yet is capable of doing things on the sly, perhaps eliciting allies who are less shy.

I need to be careful and not do anything that will justify her carrying out her threats.

This last poem made it clear that there can never be a peaceful resolution, only a Mexican stand-off, and that my best defense against provocation is not to react, and hope that over time (as she so aptly put) it will all fade away.


   2012 menu

email to Al Sullivan

Saturday, August 27, 2022

Still crazy after almost a year Aug. 30, 2012

   

At first glance, it is difficult to make a case that her most recent poem has anything to do with me.

It seems innocuous, just a bunch of cliches about time strung together, an almost pleasant romp as she flexes her poetic muscles – until the next to the last stanza which seems like a shot to the heart.

Paraphrasing, the open opens with “time will tell,” followed by “Time healing all wounds, and that time marches on (the one cliché she manages to avoid) and cannot be stopped, she using a puzzling term of time being unstoppable second only to death.

In an allusion to Einstein, she describes time as relative, going fast or slow depending (and her she personifies it) on how it feels.

There is never enough time, yet trouble if there is too much time on our hands.

It moves quickly when things are good and drags when they are not.

Time, she said, is a cruel mistress, but it is also father time.

Sometimes the time is not right and at other times it is just right, and people find a lot of ways how to kill time.

People are always in a hurry to save time, and yet seek ways to preserve it.

Then in another odd phrase, she says in order to seize time (perhaps alluding to seizing the day), we have to deny it.

She makes reference to the old wives’ tale about a stitch in time saves nine (basically meaning it you take care of something right away; it won’t get worse later).

But then, we get to the troublesome next to last stanza in which she calls time crazy, a fleeting wanderer with a personality disorder, as annoying as a gnat, yet “clever, ill-timed and elusive.”

She closes the poem by saying this last makes sense since “we invented it,” despite not knowing exactly what it is.

After having read the poem over and over, I come to believe that it is an allegory, saying something far more sinister that it would otherwise imply.

The speaker in the poem is utterly reasonable, someone who appears to be making an observation about the nature of time, but the poem seems to be about something more.

The point of view shifts between a number of pronouns, “I,” “we,” “they” and “it” and yet maintains an extremely remote point of view, factual, unlike some of the more personal poems she’s posted over the last half year.

It is easy to substitute time for love or even one or more of her alleged stalkers.

By opening the poem with the phrase “Only time will tell,” she appears to allude to the frustrated hopes of people who have professed to love her and who she has cast aside, people who hold out hope that her feelings for them might change if enough time passes – this idea supported by the next line about time healing all wounds, even though she has said in other places this is not at all possible.

The next line talks about time being “unstoppable,” which may well be taken as persistent (a pest even, which later is echoed in the next to last stanza). This is followed by an extreme negative comparing time to death – perhaps referring to her own fears as expressed in previous poems about “locking and unlocking” because she feels unsafe.

The poem makes frequent references to the speed of time, calling it relative in the second stanza, and later about how to save it, hold onto it, even seize it – references that would work as well if talking about love or some other ethereal aspect of life.

There seems to be this idea of good feelings that generally come at the start of a relationship passed all too soon, while the bitter after taste of the breakup lingers on, and that people with too much time on their hands might spend too much time speculating on it and find many ways to kill it off.

For those still clinging, love, time or even the poet might seem like a cruel mistress.

The next to last stanza, however, stands out in a number of ways, and is the reason why I suspect I am – at least in part – the target of the poem.

To fully get the impact on this stanza, I’ll quote it in full

“I say time is a schizophrenic jerk, an ephemeral vagrant with borderline personality, a nagging bother with a clever, ill-timed (snicker) elusiveness.”

 This comes in the aftermath of our friendship earlier this year in which she failed to pin me down and shape me into her new stalker, and suggests that somehow, I have interfered with her plans, and I have somehow eluded her, as if she refuses to believe my silence over the last month, and insists without evidence that I am somewhere in the background bent on foiling her schemes – whatever they might be.

 

   2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Friday, August 26, 2022

Another mistake or what? Aug. 29, 2012

  

Nothing could have gone more wrong today than my humiliating myself at the main office.

I arrived in about 9, leaving my car parked at the top of the hill to avoid the odious fines imposed by the town.

She and the owner arrived at the same time about fifteen minutes later, both in a jolly mood.

I kept my head down as they made their way passed my little niche on the second floor, feeling all the more like Harry Potter.

I did as much as the meeting to avoid looking at her so as not to feed into her fantasy of thinking I’m one of those who stare, aching for the meeting to end so I could get back to my desk and cover.

This was a short week, but she was praised at the meeting for a very good, if also a story strongly alluding to sex.

It was so good a story I asked if it could be included in my paper.

Unfortunately, when I approached her desk after the meeting, I couldn’t remember the name of it, only that it involved music.

I felt like a complete idiot and received in reply her icy stare.

I made my escape as quickly as possible without quite falling over my own feet, taking refuge in my little cupboard beneath the stairs.

Later, I managed to recover a little of my dignity and emerged to have a conversation with some of the other writers.

I heard her huff and puff from beyond her desk barrier in apparent disapproval. I remembered her once complaining about how many of the other writers loved me.

We took this conversation back down to my little hovel beneath the stairs, only to have her huffing and puffing as she passed on her way down. I couldn’t read her expression because of the wide sunglasses she wore. This was followed by somewhat dirty looks from the owner, who seemed to think we were wasting time. He paused long enough to tell me that one of my stories would have to be in her paper this week – since it was a short week after all.

His idea or hers?

I didn’t raise the question with him about her story being in mine. Why push my luck?

I felt like a crab by the end of the day, holed up, in a panic that I might have somehow made things worse for myself.

The owner intended to leave when she did, but got held up by some last-minute details, putting him in a foul mood by the time he did leave.


  2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Thursday, August 25, 2022

Snow white or evil queen? Aug. 28, 2012

  

As I get ready to go to the main office, I realize it has been four weeks since she read me the riot act and the great silence began.

Four weeks in which I have sent no direct message except to say thanks to something she sent me once.

I had hoped for an easing of tension but have come to realize that this is not possible.

I will always remain in her eyes a potential threat, especially when it comes to her goal of “trickling up” inside our office.

She will never be secure while I remain employed in the same company. She will always make assumptions that just aren’t real.

But these are real in her mind and that’s all that matters.

She is both Snow White and the evil Queen, the innocent and the queen who is utterly insecure on her throne of power, always thinking someone will come along to unseat her, when in fact, she is the one who will eventually unseat herself.

I still don’t know how much the owner told her about my meeting with him and his partner after she raised allegations of stalking. He apparently is capable of keeping secrets, even from her.

He is very nervous all of the time, which may explain why he searched both of my computers, and why he is constantly looking to find fault with me.

But this job is all he has, henpecked at home, not at all respected by his kids. He needs to play god at the office because he has nothing else at home.

In some ways, he’s the perfect man for her to gravitate towards, a man with just enough power to give her what she wants, but too insecure to use it against her.

I wonder if he’s given her a raise yet without the excuse of making her do extra work to get it.

 

   2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Wednesday, August 24, 2022

Alone again naturally Aug. 27, 2012

  

What comes across most out of this study of her poetry is a pattern of self-perception.

She apparently sees herself as savvy, street wise player destined for greatness, someone who when gets her foot in the door of an establishment, is bound and determine not to stop until she gets to the top. And it doesn’t stop there

She told one of the office gossips that our office was just a stepping stone to some other bigger and better career opportunity. Which is just as well because in an office as small as ours there really isn’t any place for her to ascend to – unless she is looking to replace the boss and take her corner office. But the boss really is a savvy street fighter and I doubt she will be moved by a new comer after having invested nearly a decade getting herself to the top as she has.

Unless the owner creates a new position, there is no place for a new comer to go without pushing someone else out.

I don’t count myself in that since I’m have no real clout, something I think she mistook when she came after me back in March.

In the past, she has always wound up in places where there was room at the top, where she could move effortlessly from novice to pseudo boss.

In her poems, she depicts herself as victim or heroine, on a personal crusade to greatness.

She wants to be in control, not just of her inner self, but of the circumstances in which she is forced to exist, and she has learned routines that help her weave through this maze of other people’s intentions, time giving her the unique ability to outsmart and out maneuver people who might otherwise want to do her harm.

Yet for as savvy as she claims to be, she is also naïve, looking for that Cinderella end that never comes. She gets used by players who seem savvier than she is, and in almost every poem there is this intense desire for control, how to keep her life as her own, when in almost all cases, it seems to slip away from her.

There is great pain in some of her poems, legitimate pain, some clearly caused by me, although not always intentionally. There is fear, too, of dark things on the periphery of her existence she can’t see or describe against which she must muster her whole strength to survive.

This comes at great cost – because as some poems show, she is not nearly as ruthless as she needs to be to thrive in the world, she most often finds herself in, some poems showing real empathy even for those she considers her enemy.

Yet, time has taught her she needs to claw her way to get what she wants, and is clever enough, brilliant enough, sometimes ruthless enough to get it for a time, yet as one of her most recent poems points out, there are always people waiting to snatch it back from her.

Ultimately, her poems – going back to before I even met her (and those poems she posted on her previous website years earlier – depict great sadness, since all life stories come to the same end over time, and her poems often reflect the sadness even of the journey itself, for all the company she has, all of the people who profess to love her, of all those who flatter her with complements, she is fundamentally alone.

And the hard part is the fact that she knows it.

 

  2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Tuesday, August 23, 2022

No red flags Aug. 22, 2012

  

The owner ordered me into his office to complain about a story I hadn’t yet published dealing with a hospital that is our biggest advertiser.

He seemed confused, definitely agitated and more than a little annoyed. Yet, I got the feeling the story was only an excuse to call me on the carpet.

He waved away my excuses, telling me “People are on my back about it.”

He, however, was one of my excuses since he dragged me away from my usual beat to have me do a controversial story from another town.

The writer from that town had left, and while the owner would not give me that beat, he assigned stories from it that prevented me from doing the job in my own town.

But again, I got the feeling his anger was not about the job at all.

Last Friday, one of the staff called me at the satellite office to inform me the owner was looking into the computer I use in the main office, a repeat of what he did a few weeks ago in the satellite office, searching for something he suspects might help him build a case for firing me.

Was he being egged on? Or did he have regrets about not accepting my resignation back when he and his partner met me over the accusations of stalking?

Something is driving the owner, and he clearly has fixated on me.

Some others at the main office have noticed how “off” the owner has been lately, and how critical he is of me.

I was almost tempted to ask him directly what his real problem is, but I’m scared to.

You don’t wave a red flag in front of a raging bull.

Fortunately, he backed down when I stressed the fact that I’m doing work for him in a town that isn’t mine to cover, and that he’s the one who refused to assign the town to me as a beat.

But I suspect, this won’t be the end of it. If he’s looking to make trouble for me, he’ll find other things to complain about.

The question is why is he doing this to me? Why is he acting so weird?

 

 2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

 


Monday, August 22, 2022

Inuendo Aug. 21, 2012

 


She is notorious for dropping sexual innuendos during our Tuesday meetings, and she did it again yesterday.

Until recently, I thought she did this by accident; now I’m not so sure.

She seems to like shocking people. It shocked me. But I’m not sure if it shocked the owner who is often in the meeting with us. If anyone else noticed, their expressions didn’t show it.

This time she talked about some of the guys she wrote about this week and the “hanky-panky” that went on with them behind the band stand.

Almost every week, she alludes to some sexual activity at the meeting.

 One previous time, she talked about elderly woman at the senior center telling the other seniors she just wanted to get a good fuck. Then, of course, there is the famous pizza man story, about a play in which one or more women ordered pizza and then raped the delivery man when he came.

This time my body language must have given me away even though I tried to hide it.

I must be a prude and I wonder if she gets off on getting to me, here or in her blogs.

Of course, I have in the past misread some of her poetry, and I remember how upset she got when both me and her stalker misread the same poem (proving she was still conversing with him, even when she said she was not). Since then, I’ve made a concerted effort to try and “get” what her poems are about, even though I’m sure I don’t always get it right. And I try not to react in anyway that will let her know she got to me – especially those angry poems in late June and early July. Why give her the satisfaction?

I’m still stung over the forgiveness poem. Fortunately, I’ve not spoken to her in several months except dealing with official business, and not much of that.

I thought I caught her glancing at me after her hanky-panky remark, as if needing me to react, or maybe I’m just mistaken.

Every time I think we’ve reached a level of peace, she does something or posts something to suggest otherwise.

I suspect she really, really hates me.

  

 2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Sunday, August 21, 2022

Mean spirited Aug. 20, 2012

  

She didn’t know I was seated at the desk behind the barrier when she started to mock a council member from one of the towns she covers, someone she had just written a story about.

This came in reaction to his calling her to thank her for the write up.

When she hung up, she mockingly laughed about the man telling one of the other women that the council member actually believed she cared if he lived or died.

He (the council member) was running against the mayor of the town, someone whom she sometimes seemed aligned to, although she has sometimes said disparaging things about the mayor as well.

I was seated behind a barrier trying to recover photos from one of the computer servers, an unusual place for me to be, which is why she did not detect me.

I don’t know why her talk bothered me, but clearly, she was trying to humiliate the man she had interviewed, making him look foolish in the eyes of one of the other office people.

This suggested that if she did this to him, she is capable of doing the same thing about anybody, including me.

This conversation painted her as more ruthless and gave new meaning to the “clawing” she possibly meant in her recently posted poem.

When I first read the poem, I didn’t take it personally – except as me being part of a crowd. But listening to her and reading the poem again, I get the idea that perhaps it was more directly aimed at me, “Their stares shooting” through her aligned with an accusation she made about my staring at her at work. And the whole end of the poem playing off the concept of stalking, “if you don’t look back, maybe they aren’t really there, but they are.”

The idea that “they” would take away what she clawed to take in the first place seems more ruthless after the conversation than I thought when reading the poem for the first time.

“He liked what I wrote,” she told her female coworker, “even the part about his once being a male stripper.”

And laughing, she went on, “So much for my needing these stories to make myself popular.”

This last was perhaps an allusion to one of my poems, making me suspect how obsessed she might be about things I’ve said or written.

She had meant her story about the councilmember to be demeaning, perhaps to counter a more positive column I had written about him, and she found it humorous that he did not realize just how demeaning a story it was.

This scared me a little. I had not until that moment realized just how intentional at times her viciousness could be.

She and her co-worker were still laughing about it as they made their way down the stairs, and I hurriedly eased out from where I sat to get back to the place where I was expected to be sitting. The last thing I needed was to be caught ease dropping. More evidence in her case against me, I suppose.

 

 2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Saturday, August 20, 2022

Clawing her way Aug. 19, 2012

   

She is almost like two people, the private person she portrays in poems, and the public persona that manufactures an invincible image, almost to the point of self-promoting. She is constantly bragging to the office gossips about her big plans and such.

I think that’s what may make me so dangerous in that I see past the masks sometimes, the other personalities exposed, some of these the victim she paints herself in poems, but at other times, the perpetually hungry soul, who has she said in yesterday’s poem “clawed” to get what she wants, and she lives in constant fear someone might take away from her.

She is clearly conscious of this side of herself, admitting it in poems at times, such as the poem in which she talks about trickling up, doing whatever it takes to get what she wants.

Love may even get in the way of her ambition, which may explain why she seems unhappy even after she announced she has a new boyfriend.

She claims she’s never cheated when involved, even though her ex-husband often accused her of doing so when they were touring with the band, suggesting love may be a burden to some seeking to make it to the top.

She also claims she doesn’t lie, which would handicap her even more if she’s telling the truth about not lying.

There is something very sad in all this, a kind of self-defeating pattern of behavior that takes away what she clawed her way to get, not just here, but everywhere she’s been, something always goes wrong, someone always takes back what she took, and she has to start from scratch again.

Yesterday’s poem shows her deep fear, and strategies to somehow not call attention to herself so she might succeed this time. If only she keeps her mouth shut, maybe “they” won’t notice her, even though she feels as if they are staring at her all the time.

She once accused me of staring at her at work, which I’ve been very conscious not to do since she claimed it.

But something has stirred up her old fears, and if not just me, then who else does she feel threatened by?

I thought everything would be better if I complied with her rules, and I have, and yet, she still feels threatened.


 2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Friday, August 19, 2022

Silence is more than golden Aug. 18, 2012

  

Nearly four weeks after her birthday bash, she posted a poem that is nearly a throwback to the much more uncomfortable time before it.

And I can’t figure out why.

But this is not a poem of command the way her poem on forgiveness was, demanding and indignant.

This is not a poem about accepting fate as her poem was about quick sand.

This certainly is not a poem about condolence as her poem about compassion appeared to be.

This poem isn’t angry so much as bitter and seems to be advice to herself on how to cope as if she still feels she is being pressured from outside.

Since it comes at a time when I have been utterly compliant, it is difficult to understand how it would be aimed at me.

And yet…

Put together with her sometimes chilly greetings at the office and the owner’s questionable search of my computer, I can’t help thinking I somehow still pose a threat to her.

The poem opens with the need to find a way to cope, that the tension will “melt away” if only she can keep her mouth shut, implying she might have said something that inspired an attack on her, causing her heart to once more beat madly in her chest.

If she keeps her mouth shut, she says, her heart rate will slow, and her mind will cease its worrying.

“It’s easier that way,” she writes.

It is also easier not to “take” so that “they” can’t take it away, take what she claims she clawed her life to get.

There is a possible dual meaning in this line, one suggesting she has clawed her way to get ahead in life, the other that she clawed for her life – meaning survival.

She also acknowledges a threat of some time, claiming “their stares” shoot through her “to the raw quick.”

This is a curious phrase that has a number of meanings. To be deeply wounded or distressed. But it also refers to the soft tender flesh below the growing part of a fingernail – which may refer to her clawing.

The quick also has an older meaning referring to those who are still alive, as in the quick and the dead.

She tells herself that if she doesn’t look back at those staring at her, they might be there. But they always are, and she advises herself in the poem to remain “closed and calm.”

The poem clearly is an effort calm herself. You get the impression that her basic character is savvy and street smart and has been through this before.

The whole purpose of the poem seems to be a reminder of what she needs to do to survive.

The poem does not make clear what the threat it, only that someone – most likely more than one – is seeking to take something from her that she has “clawed” her way to get, and in this, she tells herself if she didn’t take it in the first place, they couldn’t take it back from her.

They are always watching her, and by inference, judging her, getting under her skin with their stares, and even though she pretends they aren’t there, they are, always, and her only defense seems to be staying silent.

There is a manic tone to the poem in that the speaker is seeking to calm another part of her that may well be in a panic.

The poem is structured around four uneven stanzas, forced calming in the first, taking and being taken in the second, awareness of being watched in the third, and finally returning to the theme from the first stanza in the last by advising silence.

Who “they” are, she doesn’t say.  But the use of “then” takes the poem beyond a single person or stalker but lumps a number of people together as a malevolent force determined to deny her what she believes she’s worked hard to get, a force that makes her feel bad or guilty about herself. And won’t go away, leaving her only the option of silent endurance.

As with all of her more complicated poems, the more I read it the more I get out of is, sometimes coming up with a different interpretation when I do, and this is very much the case with this poem.

Below is another somewhat different interpretation of the same poem.

In some ways, this poem reflects her most recent thinking so far, and should somehow reflect her current feelings – perhaps about the new boyfriend she told us about recently.

As with her last poem which gave an accounting of her life up till then, I’m hoping this poem has nothing to do with me (but as said earlier I’m most likely included in the pack of wolves.) After a month with no communication between us, I had hoped she had moved on.

In this poem, we get a slightly different narrator from her previous poem, sone less in third person looking back at her life, but someone speaking to herself, giving herself advice as to how to get through some current crisis. She is looking over her shoulder at people who are pursuing her. She is trying to calm herself. The other self she is speaking to is apparently upset and scared, in a panic over these perceived enemies. The speaker of the poem is telling her how to stay calm. The speaker is extremely practical, telling her other self to shut up and in silence can hold her own.

This comes at a time when she – for some reason – became colder and more distant. She made no effort Tuesday to communicate as she had the previous Tuesday, raising the prospect that I am indeed included as one of those she is looking over her shoulder about. But it is clear from the poem, I am not alone.

The line “stares shoot through you to the quick,” echoes a false accusation she made against me, true possibly only when we first met, but certainly not over the last three months. This raises the question as to whether she also means someone else at the office or someone maybe even outside the office.

This panic seems to be growing in her and may be tied to incidents mentioned in her previous poem about looking back when she said things were good for five days but on the sixth, they were not.

Why not?

The tone and content of the poem suggests panic and a deteriorating situation, perhaps some major disappointment from a week earlier.

The setting has to be some public space – since people stare at her. I am guessing the office, but it could also be some social place, a bar perhaps where she hangs out where “they” get to stare at her. The poem was posted on Saturday rather than her usual Sunday or Monday posting, suggesting that the crisis grew out of the week prior, giving strength to the connection between this and her previous poem and that mysterious sixth day.

The previous poem posted on Monday seemed to reflect the sleepless night on Sunday. This poem, however, seems to portray an ongoing series of events – not just one. People staring at her, seeking to take away all she has “clawed for.”

This suggest I might be part of crowd, not the central focus (I hope) and seems to center of something that happened at the office during the previous week. Since she has moved up the food chain, she clearly fears she might lose what she has gained.

If outside the office, some relationship may have soured -- especially when the mayor of one of her towns got indicted.

But then, it may come back to me after all since I suggested in my column that he step down, and after she wrote a story designed to humiliate that mayor’s chief opponent, and the opponent claimed he liked the story.

The central purpose of the poem, however, is an effort to calm herself by developing a strategy for dealing with perceived attacks by her enemies, “don’t talk”, talking gives her enemies something to use against her.

Sometimes she talks too much, such as to the other writers, and especially to the office gossips. She, of course, did not know I had over heard her mocking the politician, yet it struck me during that conversation that she alluded to a poem I once wrote about her in which I claimed she used her job as a way to build her ego – quoting almost directly from it and suggesting just how deeply the poem had affected her. She later toned down her mocking during our staff meeting as if it occurred to her, it might make her sound biased.

Some of this must have occurred to her when writing the poem since the message was simple: keep your mouth shut and other people can’t hurt you.

The poem achieves interesting irony by contrasting soothing phrases against harsh one such as “clawed” vs. “melts away.”

In fact, the phrase “Melts away if you keep your mouth shut” is an odd metaphor almost like chocolate melting in your mouth, a savoring of a drug that allows the heart to calm down and the mind to soften.

The repetition of the word “take” in the next stanza is significant, instead of “give and take” we get “take and take,” and “clawing” alluding to being in a cat fight or dog eat dog world where only the tough survive. The use of clawed suggests that she cannot get ahead any other way, and yet at the same time she is not without regret (or remorse as some of her earlier poems hint.

The poem also reveals her constant struggle for self-control, force calmness in the face of adversity and the more than a little bit of paranoia that suggests her enemies are always there.

In the subtext, the poem paints her as a savvy street fighter, who justifies all of her actions by clawing for her life. More importantly it implies that she really can’t trust anybody else.

As ruthless as she appears to be and as talented, she is – as this and other poems reveal – scared and vulnerable, constantly checking herself to keep herself “on track”, as if the only way she can survive. She seems to believe she is entitled to whatever she’s clawed to get and is resentful that someone else might try and take it away.

 

 


email to Al Sullivan

Thursday, August 18, 2022

Like a bolt of lightning Aug. 17, 2012

  

Her mood swings are driving me crazy.

Utterly cold on Tuesday, she warmed up to me today, making me believe Mary Ann’s assessment that what she really wants is control.

The whole conflict over her birthday three weeks ago seems less about wishing her an unwelcome happy birthday than it was about keeping me in my place with a follow up poem telling me to accept the inevitable – which I have.

She doesn’t want me to contact her, and yet at the office she continues to contact me – usually for something she really doesn’t need.

As she did today, asking me something about happenings in the town I cover which have nothing to do with her.

Today, she emailed me about a story about a strip club worker working in one of her towns that happens to live in the town I cover. Something I know nothing about and have no information to give her.

The email popped up like a bolt of lightning.

Since I had been told never to forward anything to her ever again including press releases relevant to her, this sudden intrusion shocked me.

It is difficult to tell whether this is a friendly gesture or a provocation, a trap of some sort to show I violated my part of our agreement. This coming after the owner’s search of my computer and coming up empty may have inspired this.

Do I respond or not? Do I take this as an indication that it is okay as long as she makes the first move?

Or is this one more test to determine if I will honor the rules, and if so, I hope I pass.

 

 2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Wednesday, August 17, 2022

The search for hidden secrets Aug. 16, 2012

   

I caught the owner seated at my computer in the auxiliary office yesterday morning, directories and subdirectors open all over the screen.

He seemed to be searching for something and looked startled when I came in unexpectedly through the back door instead of the front.

“You have programs loaded in your computer I don’t recognize,” he said, almost angrily.

“Yes,” I said. “I installed extra antivirus and anti-snoop software.”

“Why would you need anti-snoop software?” he asked, eyeing me suspiciously.

“Just a precaution,” I said.

His needing to get past those extra safeguards had taken him additional time, otherwise, he might have done his snooping and taken off without me knowing about it.

What was he looking for?

If it was anything about her, he wouldn’t find it.

I hand write my journal into blank hard cover notebooks, and anything personal I type, I saved to an external or a thumb drive, which I carefully detach from the computer when I’m done.

I don’t do this to be sneaky, but rather because I move from computer to computer, here, and at the main office, as well as at home and want those things with me wherever I am.

Anything I wrote to post on my log I saved directly to a thumb drive, never to the hard drive, and any communication with Mary Ann or GA about her I did not access from any of the work computers.

But seeing him snooping made me grateful for the habit.

I kept thinking about the personal phone call she had left the meeting to take on Tuesday, and wondered if he was from him, wondered if she complained about me, and that this search of my hard drive was a product of that.

Despite being away for a week, he had not come to the meeting on Tuesday at all.

Was last week the five days she meant in the poem, and the sixth day the day he returned?

He relinquished my computer, obviously satisfied after his search. Again, he didn’t seem himself, a bit bewildered, and he refused to look directly at me as if he was guilty of something.

His motivation for searching my computer confused me. Had she urged him to find her more proof of stalking when there was no proof to be found?

Why would she disturb the peace like that now that we’d found detente?

Or was he acting on his own, looking for an excuse to back track on his promise not to fire me with the excuse found evidence supporting her accusations.

What did he have to gain by it all?

One thing for certain, I’m going to have to be very, very careful not to give him any excuse to fire me, whether in regard to her or the job in general.

 

 2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Tuesday, August 16, 2022

Cold war of silence Aug. 15, 2012

  

I have no clue as to what she is up to, seeing her only once a week at the meeting in the main office and reading the poems she posts less and less frequently.

Her last two poems, I believe, have nothing to do with me, which is a relieve considering that so many of those prior to that did.

Because we work for the same company, she can’t quite slam the door the way she has in the past with her lovers turned stalkers – although even in those cases, she doesn’t seem to give up one stalker until she has someone to replace him or her.

She always needs someone to be protected from.

While she maintains a fictional façade of strength, she is incredibly vulnerable, a fact I didn’t realize until recently.

She also seems extremely conflicted, declaring she won’t forgive me in one poem, and then after my surrender to her, posts two poems that might be taken as kind.

Last week, she wrote a nostalgic poem about her past and present that clearly did not involve me.

Since I have not commented on any of her poems (or posted a poetic response) in more than three weeks, nor have I emailed or texted her since being read the riot act after her birthday, her poem posted Sunday into Monday seemed to indicate troubles that had nothing to do with me.

Perhaps she misread a poem I posted on my blog, thinking it had to do with her when it did not, and would explain the coolness with which she greeted me yesterday.

Again, I am struck by how unhappy she seems despite the fact she has a new boyfriend.

If not for what Tom told me about RR, I might think she invented the boyfriend as a character in order to seem better protected than she really is.

What about the personal phone call she rushed out of the meeting to take yesterday?

I would think she might be content with the cold war of silence we have developed between us, which I assume how it will be from now on –nothing personal, not even professional, just co-existence, her threat like a door stop keeping the door closed just enough for her to feel safe. My sole defense is to simply ignore her.


2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Monday, August 15, 2022

She’s a mystery to me Aug. 14, 2012

  

For some reason, she announced at the meeting today she has a new boyfriend.

She didn’t look at me, although she has managed to notch up the hostility level, starting with our nearly bumping into each other when I was headed into the third-floor men’s room, and she was coming out the women’s room across the narrow corridor.

She jokingly (but likely perfectly earnest) said she would call on her new boyfriend to rescue her if she has a problem.

This undoubtedly is the same RR my political contact Tom had warned me about earlier.

Then, just as abruptly, she jumped up and left the meeting to answer an urgent call on her cell phone.

This, of course, made me think of the poem she posted yesterday, about being born with “eyes wide and skeptic” but how she knew the game, never able to grow out of what many people assumed was a phase.  She claimed she lost count of things and had to count things unrelated to keep track of her life.

When I read the poem earlier this morning, I assumed it had nothing to do with me, giving me hope that things would get better between us at work, it not friendly, certainly not hostile.

Five days ago, things were better, but on the sixth they were not.

What happened on Sunday night to cause this? Since we’ve not had any kind of contact, I assumed it was not me.  I can’t be blamed for things I did not do.

The poem once again referred to her inability to sleep, a complaint she’s had for some time, usually waking up in the early morning hours from the hamster on the hamster wheel spinning around inside her head.

Why is she so suddenly hostile when she should be happy about her new relationship?

Did something happen between her and the owner or her and our former temporary boss?

If she is in love again, why didn’t the poem reflect that, instead of continuing disappointment of her inability to get what she wants, no reverse Cinderella, no magical lucky 13th hour? And why did she feel the need to announce her new relationship at work when such things ought to be kept private?

As Roy Orbison once sang, “She’s a mystery to me.”


   2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan

Sunday, August 14, 2022

It doesn’t quite add up Aug. 13, 2012

  

The most significant thing about the poem which she posted on Aug. 13 may well be what she left out.

Even more clever than usual, she used this poem as a vehicle to sum up her life so far, playing with the old phrase “Bakers’ Dozen” to accomplish this.

Bakers Dozen is an English term from medieval times when bakers sold 13 loaves of bread but charged for only 12. This done to keep out of prison.

The King of England at the time was cracking down on bakers who previously routinely ripped off their customers by selling underweight loaves, and those caught faced jail time. Some bakers in order to avoid even an accidental violation of the law began to give the extra loaf.

Although I’m tempted to somehow tie in her previous poem which mentions bakers and loaves of bread, this poem is really more a reflection of her life up until today, a progress report starting at birth and how she did not seem to fit the mold of an ordinary child.

She tended know the game as well as anyone “who’d been there before,” with “eyes side and skeptic-like.”

She was different enough for people to noticed, although they dismissed it as her going through a phase, until time passed and it was, and she lost count, at which point she decided to map out her life in unrelated things to keep track.

Then, we get a very odd phrase when she claimed she once “brought the farm,” something generally associated with sudden death, although some attribute it to payments deceased soldiers’ families received that allowed them to “buy the farm.”

This seems to tie into her next phrase in which she claims to have “twice traded it in,” a common phrase used in business as it if to give up something old or used as a down payment on something new. The two phrases tied together may well mean that she once lived with the oppressive security of a home life that felt like death, and she traded this in on another way of life.

Her reference to three decades of finding herself is easy since she just celebrated her 33rd birthday.

Her four times in love is a bit complex since there is no way of knowing out of all those who shared her life, she considered worthy of love. Does she consider the high school drama teacher who got her a gig at the Apollo? Her husband clearly is one for certain, as most likely the woman she lived with in New York State. And since she announced today (this written a day after her poem was posted) that she has a new lover, is he also one of the four?

In a bit of clever word play, she talks about how five days earlier she was better, but then on the sixth day she was not. (Is this a kind of Biblical reference to creation – which actually took seven days). What exactly transpired on the Sixth day, she doesn’t say.

With a bit more word play, she talks about giving up trying to sleep eight hours at 7 a.m. – although she often complained about being awake at 3 a.m. or 5 a.m. with worry.

She talks about borrowing from the tenth cat she owned one of its nine lives, a rebirth of sorts.

At this point, we get a gap in her numeric sequence, leaving out 11 to leap directly to midnight which is the hour Cinderella had to be back before her coach turned back into a pumpkin and its horses turned back into mice, and she turned back into a house maid rather than a princess, she wishing she could reverse this so she might get all those things at 12 instead.

The remaining loaf – the 13th hour which she describes as her lucky hour – never comes.

So, what happened to number 11? Since most of the numeric references in the concluding portions of the poem deal with time, we can assume it is the 11th hour she skipped.

She is too good a poet to have overlooked this and so the absence must be intentional. But why?

The 11th hour has three significant meanings – the oldest coming out of the Bible which refers to a worker who shows up at the 11th hour and expects to get paid for all 12 hours of work.

The second reference deals with the concept of running out of time to accomplish something before it is too late.

The most modern reference comes out of the conclusion of World War I when the armistice was signed bringing peace to Europe after several years of horrible war.

Of course, she may have left it out for no reason at all. But I suspect she did so deliberately, the question remains as to why.

After many additional readings, other aspects of the poem emerge that seem to better define the underlying message she is trying to convey.

As with many of her poems, this one is written in third person, apparently about herself, summing up her life so far. The speaker is passing judgement on the person she writes about, a supposedly wiser and street-smart person than she was, seeing this other person as having made mistake she should not have made.

Although she is speaking to herself – a gullible foolish self that keeps making the same mistakes, she still naively hopes for the best. The poem is also conveying to others who she is and who she should be.

She appears to be writing the poem due to some set back in her current situation, “Five days it was better, on the sixth it’s not.”

Since I’ve been out of her life for many weeks, I’m assuming this has nothing to do with me – again, this comes at a time when she’s just started a new relationship.

Although only alluded to, the poem seems to be set early in the morning hours when she is struggling to find sleep, giving up on it, hoping for rescue at midnight by some prince holding a glass slipper.

The setting is most likely her apartment. She is restless. And it is easy to picture her seated in her kitchen window smoking a cigarette as she stares out at the world below.

She seems to want to get things to add up in her head and apparently can’t (which may also explain the missing 11th hour).  She is reflecting on how she reached this point in her life and holding out for something that never comes.

For all of what she has done, she seems to come back to the same dismal place (as reflected in an earlier poem). By using numbers to reflect each aspect of her life, she creates a tone that sums up everything, even when it doesn’t really add up.

She starts out trying to explain where it all began and how she got into the situation she’s in “with eyes wide and skeptic like,” meaning she has seen it all before and though she was being careful – after all she “knew the game.”

She pulls back and quotes something some elder must have said about perhaps her first relationship, “a phase” she would grow out of, but then repeated again and again until she can’t remember how it occurred and relies on other things to help her “keep on track” – a curious phrase suggesting less an accounting of, but steering her life in some direction, not deviating from some predetermined purpose.

“Buying the farm” appears to mean marriage, something she did only once. But what she means by trading it in twice may have to do with her musical career and her giving her husband a second chance to make good before giving it up altogether.

With her 33rd birthday just behind her, she realizes she has spent her life looking to find herself and what she wants.

Again, we come to the mysterious phrase of for five days she felt better, but on the sixth day not. It is difficult to know precisely what happened.

Since I already noticed the change that occurs with her personality when she gets home from work, it’s easy to believe that she means 7 p.m. is the time when she realizes she’s not going to have an easy time getting to sleep. It is also a time when she starts to drink.

Borrowing one of her cat’s nine lives may well suggest the comfort she gets hunkering down with them against the lonely hours ahead, and the hope that she might escape the loneliness in some fairytale, or perhaps in the bewitching 13th hour she always sees as lucky.

Her use of terms “skeptic like” and “Knowing the game” says that she sees herself as a self-aware, savvy player, who should be tough enough to handle herself in her perpetual search for love in a hostile world of users.

“It’s just a phase,” hints of judgments other people have had about her previous ill choices and how she keeps repeating them. As previously pointed out, she uses “on track,” not “to keep track,” which means she still knows where she wants to get to and won’t let anyone derail her.

By comparing marriage to “buying the farm” she clearly sees marriage as a scam to be avoided, a bad land deal similar to buying a bridge, and has pointed out earlier, this equates to a kind of death. Trading it is, suggests a kind of lemon car deal,” in which she was lucky to have gotten out of it with her fortune still intact.

In borrowing one of the lives from the tenth cat she’s owned, she’s suggested that she’s run out of her own lives, having had more cats to love than people (who have loved her even).

The Cinderella reference suggests just how much of an illusion of finding a prince charming and may be better off as the stepped-on step sister.

The 13th hour line – the witching hour – suggests she may have to rely on her darker side of herself to survive – although even that may not work.

This poem doesn’t rely on a lot of imagery, but the few she supplies are very powerful. She often plays off accepted cliches, pulling reverses to give new meaning to them, often creating oxymorons, such as the innocence of “eyes wide” as compared to the street-smart “skeptic like” and “knew the game,” suggesting she is a wolf like character hidden in sheep like innocence. She knows what is going on around her and yet was still taken in enough to buy the farm, coming out of it wise enough not to make that mistake again.

The imagery of time is more subtle since she starts out in more or less contemporary time when she has already wised up about the world, and then goes back to when elders called her love a phase and then through other relationships, eventually marriage, marching on until she narrows the scope again to a single day, starting at 7 p.m. through to the 13th hour, with only that mysterious 11th hour missing.

But is 11 really missing?

Here perhaps is one of the most brilliant aspects of this poem – how she comes up with 11 – by borrowing one of the nine lives from one of the ten cats she’s owned; she comes up with the number 11.

Ultimately, the poet is asking what exactly has her life added up to?

The paradox in the poem comes near the beginning when she infers innocence of birth and yet compares it to someone who has seen it all before, and yet looking back, as savvy as she was, she still seems to have been taken in – by life and the cruel world.

Over all the poet doesn’t really like what her life has added up to so far, even though it is a life rich with experience.

 

    2012 menu


email to Al Sullivan